Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34460413›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2021

COVID-19 Health Crisis and Chronic Illness: Protocol for a Qualitative Study.

Élise Ricadat, Aude Béliard, Marie Citrini, Yann Craus, Céline Gabarro, Marie-France Mamzer, Ana Marques, Thomas Sannié, Maria Teixeira, Marko Tocilovac and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Élise RicadatInstitut La Personne en Médecine, Université de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8202-1523
Aude BéliardInstitut La Personne en Médecine, Université de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8853-8037
Marie CitriniReprésentante des Usagers Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6208-1630
Yann CrausInstitut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques (IHPST), Université Paris 1 - Panthéon Sorbonne, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6355-0697
Céline GabarroInstitut La Personne en Médecine, Université de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9312-2060
Marie-France MamzerUnité de Recherche Ethics, Research, Translation (ETREs), Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Université de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7570-1803
Ana MarquesEtablissement Public de Santé Mentale Ville Evrard, Neuilly-sur-Marne, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7451-2816
Thomas SanniéAssociation Française des Hémophiles, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9220-1840
Maria TeixeiraLaboratoire Épidémiologie Clinique et Evaluation Economique appliqué aux populations Vulnérables (ECEVE), Université de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4085-9533
Marko TocilovacInstitut La Personne en Médecine, Université de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7528-2995
Livia VelpryInstitut La Personne en Médecine, Université de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0285-6171
François VillaInstitut La Personne en Médecine, Université de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2587-6039
Louise ViroleInstitut La Personne en Médecine, Université de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3782-181X
Céline LefèveInstitut La Personne en Médecine, Université de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4897-5339
Université Paris Cité · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRAssociation Française de Chirurgie · FRHôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FRInstitut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe acute nature of the COVID-19 pandemic has put a strain on health resources that are usually dedicated to chronic illnesses. Resulting changes in care practices and networks have had major repercussions on the experience of people with chronic disorders.

objectiveThis paper presents the protocol of the Parcours, Associations, Réseau, Chronicité, Organisation, Usagers, Retour d'expérience, Soins (PARCOURS)-COVID study. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of reorganization of the health system on the usual care network of patients with chronic illness, which fosters and qualifies the quality and continuum of care provided. The first objective of this study is to document these patients' experiences through transformations and adaptations of their network, both in the practical dimension (ie, daily life and care) and subjective dimension (ie, psychosocial experience of illness and relationship to the health system). The second objective of the study is to understand and acknowledge these reorganizations during the COVID-19 lockdown and postlockdown periods. The third objective is to produce better adapted recommendations for patients with chronic illness and value their experience for the management of future health crisis.

methodsThe PARCOURS-COVID study is a qualitative and participatory research involving patient organizations as research partners and members of these organizations as part of the research team. Three group of chronic diseases have been selected regarding the specificities of the care network they mobilize: (1) cystic fibrosis and kidney disease, (2) hemophilia, and (3) mental health disorders. Four consecutive phases will be conducted, including (1) preparatory interviews with medical or associative actors of each pathology field; (2) in-depth individual interviews with patients of each pathology, analyzed using the qualitative method of thematic analysis; (3) results of both these phases will then be triangulated through interviews with members of each patient's care ecosystem; and finally, (4) focus groups will be organized to discuss the results with research participants (ie, representatives of chronic disease associations; patients; and actors of the medical, psychosocial, and family care network) in a research-action framework.

resultsThe protocol study has undergone a peer review by the French National Research Agency's scientific committee and has been approved by the research ethical committee of the University of Paris (registration number: IRB 00012020-59, June 28, 2020). The project received funding from August 2020 through April 2021. Expected results will be disseminated in 2021 and 2022.

conclusionsOur findings will better inform the stakes of the current health crisis on the management of patients with chronic illness and, more broadly, any future crisis for a population deemed to be at risk. They will also improve health democracy by supporting better transferability of knowledge between the scientific and citizen communities. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/28728.

Indexed as

carechronic illnessCOVIDCOVID-19health democracypandemicpreventionqualitative studyriskvulnerability

Identifiers

PMID34460413
PMCPMC8432515
OpenAlexW3152833108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.