ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2022
Learning to Disentangle Inter-Subject Anatomical Variations in Electrocardiographic Data.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- First-line risk stratification with machine learning models facilitates rapid triage for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- AI analysis for ejection fraction estimation from 12-lead ECG.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- BOATMAP: Bayesian Optimization Active Targeting for Monomorphic Arrhythmia Pace-mapping.Computers in biology and medicine · 2024Article
- Algorithmic fairness in artificial intelligence for medicine and healthcare.Nature biomedical engineering · 2023Review
- State-of-the-Art Deep Learning Methods on Electrocardiogram Data: Systematic Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Review
- Automatic Multichannel Electrocardiogram Record Classification Using XGBoost Fusion Model.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis work investigates the possibility of disentangled representation learning of inter-subject anatomical variations within electrocardiographic (ECG) data.
methodsSince ground truth anatomical factors are generally not known in clinical ECG for assessing the disentangling ability of the models, the presented work first proposes the SimECG data set, a 12-lead ECG data set procedurally generated with a controlled set of anatomical generative factors. Second, to perform such disentanglement, the presented method evaluates and compares deep generative models with latent density modeled by nonparametric Indian Buffet Process to account for the complex generative process of ECG data.
resultsIn the simulated data, the experiments demonstrate, for the first time, concrete evidence of the possibility to disentangle key generative anatomical factors within ECG data in separation from task-relevant generative factors. We achieve a disentanglement score of 92.1% while disentangling five anatomical generative factors and the task-relevant generative factor. In both simulated and real-data experiments, this work further provides quantitative evidence for the benefit of disentanglement learning on the downstream clinical task of localizing the origin of ventricular activation. Overall, the presented method achieves an improvement of around 18.5%, and 11.3% for the simulated dataset, and around 7.2%, and 3.6% for the real dataset, over baseline CNN, and standard generative model, respectively.
conclusionThese results demonstrate the importance as well as the feasibility of the disentangled representation learning of inter-subject anatomical variations within ECG data. SIGNIFICANCE: This work suggests the important research direction to deal with the well-known challenge posed by the presence of significant inter-subject variations during an automated analysis of ECG data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.