Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34459993›Full record

ArticleBulletin of mathematical biology2021

Targeting Cellular DNA Damage Responses in Cancer: An In Vitro-Calibrated Agent-Based Model Simulating Monolayer and Spheroid Treatment Responses to ATR-Inhibiting Drugs.

Sara Hamis, James Yates, Mark A J Chaplain, Gibin G Powathil

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of mathematical biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sara HamisSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK. sjh37@st-andrews.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1105-8078
James YatesOncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Mark A J ChaplainSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
Gibin G PowathilDepartment of Mathematics, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
University of St Andrews · GBAstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBSwansea University · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R017506/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We combine a systems pharmacology approach with an agent-based modelling approach to simulate LoVo cells subjected to AZD6738, an ATR (ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated and rad3-related kinase) inhibiting anti-cancer drug that can hinder tumour proliferation by targeting cellular DNA damage responses. The agent-based model used in this study is governed by a set of empirically observable rules. By adjusting only the rules when moving between monolayer and multi-cellular tumour spheroid simulations, whilst keeping the fundamental mathematical model and parameters intact, the agent-based model is first parameterised by monolayer in vitro data and is thereafter used to simulate treatment responses in in vitro tumour spheroids subjected to dynamic drug delivery. Spheroid simulations are subsequently compared to in vivo data from xenografts in mice. The spheroid simulations are able to capture the dynamics of in vivo tumour growth and regression for approximately 8 days post-tumour injection. Translating quantitative information between in vitro and in vivo research remains a scientifically and financially challenging step in preclinical drug development processes. However, well-developed in silico tools can be used to facilitate this in vitro to in vivo translation, and in this article, we exemplify how data-driven, agent-based models can be used to bridge the gap between in vitro and in vivo research. We further highlight how agent-based models, that are currently underutilised in pharmaceutical contexts, can be used in preclinical drug development.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPharmaceutical PreparationsAnimalsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsCell Line, TumorDNA DamageMathematical ConceptsMiceNetwork PharmacologyXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsPharmaceutical PreparationsAgent-based modelAZD6738DNA damage response inhibitionMathematical oncology

Identifiers

PMID34459993
PMCPMC8405495
OpenAlexW3197341712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.