Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34459972›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2022

Role of the alpha-fetoprotein response in immune checkpoint inhibitor-based treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Ha Il Kim, Jihye Lim, Ju Hyun Shim

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Hyperprogressive disease in carcinoma induced by immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a systematic review.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. The Landscape Of Alpha Fetoprotein In Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Where Are We?International journal of biological sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ha Il KimDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5471-7790
Jihye LimDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
Ju Hyun ShimDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea. s5854@amc.seoul.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7336-1371
Ulsan College · KRKyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2017R1E1A1A01074298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe dynamics of serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level have been found to be a useful predictor of therapeutic responsiveness in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We evaluated whether AFP changes were able to accurately reflect imaging-based responses and predict prognosis in patients receiving therapies including immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

methodsA total of 108 HCC patients with baseline serum AFP ≥ 20 ng/mL who received ICI-based treatment were included. We evaluated AFP-based responses, coupled with radiographic responses by RECIST, at 6-10 (time-point 1, TP1) and 14-18 weeks (time-point 2, TP2) of therapy in terms of the change of AFP from baseline, with a > 20% decrease or increase in level corresponding to the AFP response and progression, respectively. We examined the correlations between AFP and imaging-based responses, and the prognostic implications of the AFP-based measure.

resultsBased on AFP change, there were 24 and 20 responders and 74 and 24 progressors at TP1 and TP2, respectively. The AFP responders yielded radiological objective responses in 90.9% (10/11) and 93.8% (15/16) of the cases at TP1 and TP2, respectively, compared with only 1.4% and none, respectively, of the AFP progressors at the corresponding times. The agreement between progression by RECIST and increased AFP level at the two time-points was 93.8% and 95.0%, respectively. The accuracy of the AFP-based criterion for predicting radiologic response/progression was comparable at TP1 and TP2. Both "AFP responder" and "AFP progressor" at TP1 or TP2 independently predicted the overall survival of patients (adjusted hazard ratios [95% confidence intervals], 0.360 [0.174-0.743] and 0.315 [0.117-0.850]; and 2.525 [1.362-4.679] and 3.908 [1.563-9.769], respectively).

conclusionOur study suggests that on-treatment AFP changes can complement imaging findings and provide prognostic information for evaluating patients with AFP-producing HCC treated with ICI-based regimens.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver Neoplasmsalpha-FetoproteinsBiomarkers, TumorHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsTreatment Outcomealpha-FetoproteinsBiomarkers, TumorImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsHepatocellular carcinomaImmune-checkpoint inhibitorSerum alpha-fetoproteinTreatment response

Identifiers

PMID34459972
PMCPMC11801150
OpenAlexW3196922443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.