ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2021
[Development of classification criteria for uveitis by the standardization of uveitis nomenclature (SUN) working group].
Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi‑omics insights into uveitis: From mechanisms to precision medicine (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Systemic Immunomodulatory Therapy, Anterior Chamber Inflammation, and the Use of Topical Corticosteroids in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-Associated Uveitis: A Long-Term Real-Life Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Therapeutic drug monitoring and neutralizing anti-drug antibody detection to optimize TNF-alpha inhibitor treatment for uveitis.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2025Article
- "Infectious uveitis: a comprehensive systematic review of emerging trends and molecular pathogenesis using network analysis".Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2024Review
- Herpes simplex keratitis: A brief clinical overview.World journal of virology · 2024Review
- Investigation of the acute pathogenesis of spondyloarthritis/HLA-B27-associated anterior uveitis based on genome-wide association analysis and single-cell transcriptomics.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- New onset or recurrence of uveitis following COVID-19 infection.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Observational
- Rheumatologist's Perspective on Non-Infectious Uveitis: Patterns from Tertiary Referral Rheumatologic Clinics in Italy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Diagnosis, Classification, and Assessment of the Underlying Etiology of Uveitis by Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- [Here comes the "SUN" …].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021Article
- Management of oculo-orbital complications of odontogenic sinusitis in adults.Romanian journal of ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe standardization of uveitis nomenclature (SUN) working group is an international expert committee, which follows the aim to develop a standardized and internationally recognized terminology for the field of uveitis. This appears to be important in view of the demand for evidence-based medicine, especially for relatively rare diseases such as uveitis.
methodsA databank of > 4000 uveitis patients was compiled using formal consensus techniques, for whom a majority consensus was previously achieved in the diagnosis. The patient data were analyzed within the subclasses of uveitis and divided into a training set and a validation set. Multinomial logistic regressions with LASSO regularization were carried out on the training set with machine learning (ML). The accuracy of the rules that were developed to express the criteria of ML, were assessed by a masked observer in a random sample of 10%.
resultsThe estimations of total accuracy according to the uveitis classes in the validation set were high for all forms of uveitis: anterior uveitis 96.7% (95% confidence interval, CI 92.4-98.6%), intermediate uveitis 99.3% (95% CI 96.1-99.9%), posterior uveitis 98.0% (95% CI 94.3-99.3%), panuveitis 94.0% (95% CI 89.0-96.8%) and infectious posterior uveitis/panuveitis 93.3% (95% CI 89.1-96.3%).
conclusionClassification criteria are presented, which show a high degree of accuracy (low misclassification rates) and are therefore suitable for future clinical and translational research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.