Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34459947›Full record

ReviewPediatric cardiology2021

Congenital Coronary Artery Anomalies and Sudden Cardiac Death.

Marco Schiavone, Cecilia Gobbi, Alessio Gasperetti, Andrea Zuffi, Giovanni Battista Forleo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Marco Schiavone *Cardiology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco - Luigi Sacco University Hospital, University of Milan, Via G.B. Grassi, 74, 20157, Milan, Italy. marco.schiavone11@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0720-3380
Cecilia Gobbi *Department of Cardiology, Saint Martin Private Hospital Center, Caen, France.
Alessio GasperettiCardiology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco - Luigi Sacco University Hospital, University of Milan, Via G.B. Grassi, 74, 20157, Milan, Italy.
Andrea ZuffiDepartment of Cardiology, Saint Martin Private Hospital Center, Caen, France.
Giovanni Battista ForleoCardiology Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco - Luigi Sacco University Hospital, University of Milan, Via G.B. Grassi, 74, 20157, Milan, Italy.
Laboratoire Saint Martin · FRUniversity of Milan · ITJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary artery anomalies (CAAs) are a heterogeneous group of rare congenital diseases whose features and pathophysiological mechanisms are extremely variable, ranging from silent anomalies to sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the most severe cases. Although rare, congenital CAAs confer a high risk of myocardial ischemia and SCD, especially in young, previously "healthy" athletes during or immediately after vigorous exertion. Although some high-risk features that may lead to SCD have been identified, specific pathophysiological mechanisms related to SCD still remain poorly understood. When a CAA is incidentally diagnosed, optimal SCD risk stratification remains challenging, particularly in cases of anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery arising from the opposite aortic sinus of Valsalva (ACAOS). In recent times, invasive imaging with intravascular ultrasound has gained a role in further identifying high-risk anatomic features; it has been integrated with traditional, non-invasive anatomic imaging evaluations, typically high-quality echocardiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance. Multidisciplinary programs and specific SCD risk scores should be developed in an endeavor to choose the right therapeutic approach, either clinical or interventional/surgical. Intravascular ultrasound is an extremely useful tool to evaluate vessel stenosis, even if prospective studies are still required to further validate this diagnostic strategy. In the present review, we aimed to analyze the pathophysiology and the clinical impact of ACAOS. We also summarized the predominant mechanisms for interference with normal coronary artery function, which might contribute to the onset of life-threatening arrhythmias and SCD.

Indexed as

Coronary Vessel AnomaliesSinus of ValsalvaDeath, Sudden, CardiacHumansProspective StudiesAnomalous coronary artery from the opposite sinus of ValsalvaCongenital coronary artery anomalyIntravascular ultrasoundMyocardial ischemiaSudden cardiac deathSurgical treatment

Identifiers

PMID34459947
OpenAlexW3197242069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.