ReviewJournal of neuromuscular diseases2021
The Satellite Cell at 60: The Foundation Years.
Review in Journal of neuromuscular diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- State-Dependent FGF Signaling in Satellite Cell-Mediated Skeletal Muscle Regeneration and Pathological Remodeling.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Favorable outcome of engraftment of custom designed RADA16-I based hydrogels functionalized with SDF1 or IL4 mimicking peptides to injured or dystrophic muscles.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Insights into human muscle biology from human primary skeletal muscle cell culture.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 2025Review
- Distinct whole-body muscle MRI imaging patterns in PAX7-congenital myopathy: A case report.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2024Article
- How Can Proteomics Help to Elucidate the Pathophysiological Crosstalk in Muscular Dystrophy and Associated Multi-System Dysfunction?Proteomes · 2024Article
- Hallmarks of ageing in human skeletal muscle and implications for understanding the pathophysiology of sarcopenia in women and men.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2023Article
- Traumatic muscle injury.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023Review
- Cellular pathogenesis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: progressive myofibre degeneration, chronic inflammation, reactive myofibrosis and satellite cell dysfunction.European journal of translational myology · 2023Article
- NC1184: Molecular Mechanisms Regulating Skeletal Muscle Growth and Differentiation.Journal of animal science · 2022Article
- Estradiol deficiency reduces the satellite cell pool by impairing cell cycle progression.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2022Article
- Preserved stem cell content and innervation profile of elderly human skeletal muscle with lifelong recreational exercise.The Journal of physiology · 2022Article
- Defining and identifying satellite cell-opathies within muscular dystrophies and myopathies.Experimental cell research · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The resident stem cell for skeletal muscle is the satellite cell. On the 50th anniversary of its discovery in 1961, we described the history of skeletal muscle research and the seminal findings made during the first 20 years in the life of the satellite cell (Scharner and Zammit 2011, doi: 10.1186/2044-5040-1-28). These studies established the satellite cell as the source of myoblasts for growth and regeneration of skeletal muscle. Now on the 60th anniversary, we highlight breakthroughs in the second phase of satellite cell research from 1980 to 2000. These include technical innovations such as isolation of primary satellite cells and viable muscle fibres complete with satellite cells in their niche, together with generation of many useful reagents including genetically modified organisms and antibodies still in use today. New methodologies were combined with description of endogenous satellite cells markers, notably Pax7. Discovery of the muscle regulatory factors Myf5, MyoD, myogenin, and MRF4 in the late 1980s revolutionized understanding of the control of both developmental and regerenative myogenesis. Emergence of genetic lineage markers facilitated identification of satellite cells in situ, and also empowered transplantation studies to examine satellite cell function. Finally, satellite cell heterogeneity and the supportive role of non-satellite cell types in muscle regeneration were described. These major advances in methodology and in understanding satellite cell biology provided further foundations for the dramatic escalation of work on muscle stem cells in the 21st century.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.