Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34459109›Full record

ArticlePharmacology research & perspectives2021

Induced fit versus conformational selection: From rate constants to fluxes… and back to rate constants.

Georges Vauquelin, Dominique Maes

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Georges VauquelinDepartment Molecular and Biochemical Pharmacology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8613-1711
Dominique MaesStructural Biology Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Induced fit- (IF) and conformational selection (CS) binding mechanisms have long been regarded to be mutually exclusive. Yet, they are now increasingly considered to produce the final ligand-target complex alongside within a thermodynamic cycle. This viewpoint benefited from the introduction of binding fluxes as a tool for analyzing the overall behavior of such cycle. This study aims to provide more vivid and applicable insights into this emerging field. In this respect, combining differential equation- based simulations and hitherto little explored alternative modes of calculation provide concordant information about the intricate workings of such cycle. In line with previous reports, we observe that the relative contribution of IF increases with the ligand concentration at equilibrium. Yet the baseline contribution may vary from one case to another and simulations as well as calculations show that this parameter is essentially regulated by the dissociation rate of both pathways. Closer attention should be paid to how the contributions of IF and CS compare at physiologically relevant drug/ligand concentrations. To this end, a simple equation discloses how changing a limited set of "microscopic" rate constants can extend the concentration range at which CS contributes most effectively. Finally, it could also be beneficial to extend the utilization of flux- based approaches to more physiologically relevant time scales and alternative binding models.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationPharmacokineticsProtein BindingLigandsLigandsbinding fluxesconformational selectionequationsinduced fitrate constantssimulationsthermodynamic cycle

Identifiers

PMID34459109
PMCPMC8404059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.