Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34459089›Full record

Trial reportPsychology and psychotherapy2022

A cognitive behavioural intervention for low self-esteem in young people who have experienced stigma, prejudice, or discrimination: An uncontrolled acceptability and feasibility study.

Katie Langford, Katrina McMullen, Livia Bridge, Lovedeep Rai, Patrick Smith, Katharine A Rimes

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychology and psychotherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katie LangfordDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7617-3555
Katrina McMullenDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
Livia BridgeDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8995-7188
Lovedeep RaiDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.
Patrick SmithDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0743-7972
Katharine A RimesDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2634-455X
King's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesStigma has been found to be associated with lower self-esteem, which increases the risk of difficulties across life domains including vulnerability to mental health problems. There are no previous studies of interventions for people experiencing low self-esteem in the context of different stigmatized characteristics. This study evaluated feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes of an intervention targeting low self-esteem in stigmatized people aged 16-24 years.

designAn uncontrolled study with repeated measures.

methodPeople with a range of stigmatized characteristics, who had low self-esteem and associated impaired daily functioning, were recruited from the general population. The individual six-session cognitive behavioural intervention had modules chosen according to participants' formulations. The CBT included compassion-focussed therapy methods and was informed by stigma research. Feasibility was assessed in relation to recruitment, retention, and protocol adherence. Acceptability was assessed through participant feedback. Questionnaires assessing self-esteem, functioning impairments, depression, anxiety, self-criticism, self-compassion, and responses to prejudice and discrimination were administered at baseline, pre-, mid-, post-intervention, and two-month follow-up.

resultsForty-four people completed screening; 73% were eligible. Of these, 78% consented and 69% (N = 22) started the intervention. Eighteen (82%) participants completed, and four dropped out. Follow-up measures were completed by all treatment completers. Treatment completers reported the intervention was useful, improved their self-esteem and coping, and would recommend it. Ratings of usefulness and frequency of use of intervention components were high at post-treatment and follow-up.

conclusionsThe intervention was feasible and highly acceptable to treatment completers. This suggests the intervention warrants investigation in a randomized-controlled trial. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Young people with low self-esteem whom have been negatively affected by stigma may wish to access support and be willing to engage in psychological interventions. Cognitive behavioural therapy may be helpful for young people with low self-esteem who have experienced stigma, prejudice, or discrimination. Cognitive behavioural techniques such as self-compassionate thought records and behavioural experiments were considered acceptable and helpful by young people whose self-esteem has been affected by stigma. Addressing responses to stigma in therapy, such as rumination, avoidance, and perfectionism, appears to be feasible and acceptable.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyAdolescentAdultCognitionFeasibility StudiesHumansPersonality DisordersPrejudiceYoung Adultcognitive behavioural therapycompassion-focussed therapydiscriminationself-esteemstigma

Identifiers

PMID34459089
PMCPMC9292341
OpenAlexW3198897587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.