Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34459076›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of heart failure2021

Influence of endpoint definitions on the effect of empagliflozin on major renal outcomes in the EMPEROR-Preserved trial.

Milton Packer, Faiez Zannad, Javed Butler, Gerasimos Filippatos, Joao Pedro Ferreira, Stuart J Pocock, Martina Brueckmann, Cordula Zeller, Sibylle Hauske, Stefan D Anker and 1 more

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The four pillars of HFrEF therapy: is it time to treat heart failure regardless of ejection fraction?European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Milton PackerBaylor Heart and Vascular Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Faiez ZannadUniversité de Lorraine, Inserm INI-CRCT, CHRU, Nancy, France.
Javed ButlerDepartment of Medicine, University of Mississippi School of Medicine, Jackson, MS, USA.
Gerasimos FilippatosNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens University Hospital Attikon, Athens, Greece.
Joao Pedro FerreiraDepartment of Medicine, University of Mississippi School of Medicine, Jackson, MS, USA.
Stuart J PocockDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Martina BrueckmannBoehringer Ingelheim International, Ingelheim, Germany.
Cordula ZellerBiostatistics and Data Sciences, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach, Germany.
Sibylle HauskeBoehringer Ingelheim International, Ingelheim, Germany.
Stefan D AnkerDepartment of Cardiology (CVK), and Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies, German Centre for Cardiovascular Research Partner Site Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
EMPEROR-Preserved Trial Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Heart FailureBenzhydryl CompoundsGlucosidesHumansBenzhydryl CompoundsempagliflozinGlucosides

Identifiers

PMID34459076
PMCPMC9291539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.