ArticleMedical physics2021
Accurate and robust sparse-view angle CT image reconstruction using deep learning and prior image constrained compressed sensing (DL-PICCS).
Article in Medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- TOPOS: target organ prediction on scout views for automated CT scan planning.European radiology · 2026Article
- CitrusGS: 3D Gaussian splatting for sparse-view CT reconstruction and precise morphological phenotyping of citrus fruit.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Parameter Selection in Coupled Dynamical Systems for Tomographic Image Reconstruction.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Dual-Domain deep prior guided sparse-view CT reconstruction with multi-scale fusion attention.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- 2V-CBCT: Two-Orthogonal-Projection Based CBCT Reconstruction and Dose Calculation for Radiation Therapy Using Real Projection Data.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2025Article
- Sparse-View CT Joint Reconstruction Strategy with Sparse Sampling Encoding LayerCurrent medical imaging · 2025Article
- Hybrid Reconstruction Approach for Polychromatic Computed Tomography in Highly Limited-Data Scenarios.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Reducing image artifacts in sparse projection CT using conditional generative adversarial networks.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Combining physics-based models with deep learning image synthesis and uncertainty in intraoperative cone-beam CT of the brain.Medical physics · 2023Article
- PKAID-Net: Prior Knowledge Aware Iterative Denoising Neural Network for Photon Counting Detector CT.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2023Article
- Reconstruction of three-dimensional tomographic patient models for radiation dose modulation in CT from two scout views using deep learning.Medical physics · 2022Article
- Directly Filtering the Sparse-View CT Images by BM3D.SL clinical medicine : research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSparse-view CT image reconstruction problems encountered in dynamic CT acquisitions are technically challenging. Recently, many deep learning strategies have been proposed to reconstruct CT images from sparse-view angle acquisitions showing promising results. However, two fundamental problems with these deep learning reconstruction methods remain to be addressed: (1) limited reconstruction accuracy for individual patients and (2) limited generalizability for patient statistical cohorts. PURPOSE: The purpose of this work is to address the previously mentioned challenges in current deep learning methods.
methodsA method that combines a deep learning strategy with prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS) was developed to address these two problems. In this method, the sparse-view CT data were reconstructed by the conventional filtered backprojection (FBP) method first, and then processed by the trained deep neural network to eliminate streaking artifacts. The outputs of the deep learning architecture were then used as the needed prior image in PICCS to reconstruct the image. If the noise level from the PICCS reconstruction is not satisfactory, another light duty deep neural network can then be used to reduce noise level. Both extensive numerical simulation data and human subject data have been used to quantitatively and qualitatively assess the performance of the proposed DL-PICCS method in terms of reconstruction accuracy and generalizability.
resultsExtensive evaluation studies have demonstrated that: (1) quantitative reconstruction accuracy of DL-PICCS for individual patient is improved when it is compared with the deep learning methods and CS-based methods; (2) the false-positive lesion-like structures and false negative missing anatomical structures in the deep learning approaches can be effectively eliminated in the DL-PICCS reconstructed images; and (3) DL-PICCS enables a deep learning scheme to relax its working conditions to enhance its generalizability.
conclusionsDL-PICCS offers a promising opportunity to achieve personalized reconstruction with improved reconstruction accuracy and enhanced generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.