Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34458975›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2021

Diversity of maize (Zea mays L.) rhizobacteria with potential to promote plant growth.

Tairine G Ercole, Daiani C Savi, Douglas Adamoski, Vanessa M Kava, Mariangela Hungria, Lygia V Galli-Terasawa

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Isolation and characterization ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tairine G ErcoleDepartment of Genetics, Universidade Federal Do Paraná, Av. Coronel Francisco Heráclito Dos Santos, 210. CEP, Curitiba, PR, 81531-970, Brazil.
Daiani C SaviDepartment of Biomedicine, Centro Universitário Católica de Santa Catarina, R. Visconde de Taunay, 427. CEP, Joinville, SC, 89203-005, Brazil.
Douglas AdamoskiDepartment of Genetics, Universidade Federal Do Paraná, Av. Coronel Francisco Heráclito Dos Santos, 210. CEP, Curitiba, PR, 81531-970, Brazil.
Vanessa M KavaDepartment of Genetics, Universidade Federal Do Paraná, Av. Coronel Francisco Heráclito Dos Santos, 210. CEP, Curitiba, PR, 81531-970, Brazil.
Mariangela HungriaEmbrapa Soja, CEP, Londrina, PR, 86001-970, Brazil.
Lygia V Galli-TerasawaDepartment of Genetics, Universidade Federal Do Paraná, Av. Coronel Francisco Heráclito Dos Santos, 210. CEP, Curitiba, PR, 81531-970, Brazil. lgterasawa@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3125-1796
Universidade Federal do Paraná · BRBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRBrazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials · BRUniversidade Sociedade Educacional de Santa Catarina · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 465133/2014-4Fundação Araucária 043/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant growth-limiting factors, such as low nutrient availability and weak pathogen resistance, may hinder the production of several crops. Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) used in agriculture, which stimulate plant growth and development, can serve as a potential tool to mitigate or even circumvent these limitations. The present study evaluated the feasibility of using bacteria isolated from the maize rhizosphere as PGPB for the cultivation of this crop. A total of 282 isolates were collected and clustered into 57 groups based on their genetic similarity using BOX-PCR. A representative isolate from each group was selected and identified at the genus level with 16S rRNA sequencing. The identified genera included Bacillus (61.5% of the isolates), Lysinibacillus (30.52%), Pseudomonas (3.15%), Stenotrophomonas (2.91%), Paenibacillus (1.22%), Enterobacter (0.25%), Rhizobium (0.25%), and Atlantibacter (0.25%). Eleven isolates with the highest performance were selected for analyzing the possible pathways underlying plant growth promotion using biochemical and molecular techniques. Of the selected isolates, 90.9% were positive for indolepyruvate/phenylpyruvate decarboxylase, 54.4% for pyrroloquinoline quinine synthase, 36.4% for nitrogenase reductase, and 27.3% for nitrite reductase. Based on biochemical characterization, 9.1% isolates could fix nitrogen, 36.6% could solubilize phosphate, 54.5% could produce siderophores, and 90.9% could produce indole acetic acid. Enzymatic profiling revealed that the isolates could degrade starch (90.1%), cellulose (72.7%), pectin (81.8%), protein (90.9%), chitin (18.2%), urea (54.5%), and esters (45.4%). Based on the data obtained, we identified three Bacillus spp. (LGMB12, LGMB273, and LGMB426), one Stenotrophomonas sp. (LGMB417), and one Pseudomonas sp. (LGMB456) with the potential to serve as PGPB for maize. Further research is warranted to evaluate the biotechnological potential of these isolates as biofertilizers under field conditions.

Indexed as

BacteriaRhizosphereSoil MicrobiologyZea maysBacterial ProteinsBiodiversityEnzymesPhylogenyPlant RootsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBacterial ProteinsEnzymesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SInoculantsPlant growth-promoting bacteriaRhizobacteria bacteriaZea mays L. BOX-PCR

Identifiers

PMID34458975
PMCPMC8578223
OpenAlexW3198343813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.