Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34458941›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2023

Fusion rate of 89% after knee arthrodesis using an intramedullary nail: a mono-centric retrospective review of 48 cases.

Anaïs Luyet, Sylvain Steinmetz, Nicolas Gallusser, David Roche, Arnaud Fischbacher, Christophe Tissot, Olivier Borens

Open access · hybridFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Circular external fixation for knee fusion in complex indications.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anaïs LuyetDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9497-7458
Sylvain SteinmetzDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland. sylvain.steinmetz@chuv.ch.
Nicolas GallusserDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
David RocheDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Arnaud FischbacherDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Christophe TissotClinique de la Source, Avenue Bergières 2, 1004, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Olivier BorensDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
University of Lausanne · CHClinique de La Source · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeKnee arthrodesis is an established procedure for limb salvage in cases of recurrent infection, total knee arthroplasty soft tissue defect, poor bone stock or a deficient extensor mechanism. Surgical options include compression plate, external fixator and arthrodesis nail. Different types of nail exist: long fusion nail, short modular nail and bridging nail. This study presents the results on knee arthrodesis using different types of intramedullary nails. The aim is to assess if a specific type of nail has a better fusion rate, clinical outcome and lower complication rate.

methodsA mono-centric retrospective study of 48 knees arthrodesis was performed between 2000 and 2018. 15 T2

resultsFusion rate was 89.6%. Time to fusion was 6.9 months. Mean Parker score was 6.9/9 points. Visual Analogic Scale was 1.9. The Wichita

conclusionAlthough burdened by a big complication rate, knee arthrodesis with an intramedullary nail provides satisfactory results and is a good alternative to above-knee-amputation. The Wichita LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series, level IV.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeProsthesis-Related InfectionsArthrodesisBone NailsHumansKneeReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeIntramedullary nailKnee arthrodesisTotal knee arthroplasty infectionWichita

Identifiers

PMID34458941
PMCPMC10050040
OpenAlexW3197537851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read68
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.