Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34458666›Full record

ArticlePlant direct2021

Raman spectroscopy-based diagnostics of water deficit and salinity stresses in two accessions of peanut.

Rohini Morey, Charles Farber, Bill McCutchen, Mark D Burow, Charles Simpson, Dmitry Kurouski, John Cason

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant direct, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rohini MoreyDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics Texas A&M University College Station Texas USA.
Charles FarberDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics Texas A&M University College Station Texas USA.
Bill McCutchenTexas A&M AgriLife Research Stephenville Texas USA.
Mark D BurowTexas A&M AgriLife Research Lubbock Texas USA.
Charles SimpsonTexas A&M AgriLife Research Stephenville Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4579-7370
Dmitry KurouskiDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics Texas A&M University College Station Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6040-4213
John CasonTexas A&M AgriLife Research Stephenville Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2260-7140
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water deficit and salinity are two major abiotic stresses that have tremendous effect on crop yield worldwide. Timely identification of these stresses can help limit associated yield loss. Confirmatory detection and identification of water deficit stress can also enable proper irrigation management. Traditionally, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based imaging and satellite-based imaging, together with visual field observation, are used for diagnostics of such stresses. However, these approaches can only detect salinity and water deficit stress at the symptomatic stage. Raman spectroscopy (RS) is a noninvasive and nondestructive technique that can identify and detect plant biotic and abiotic stress. In this study, we investigated accuracy of Raman-based diagnostics of water deficit and salinity stresses on two greenhouse-grown peanut accessions: tolerant and susceptible to water deficit. Plants were grown for 76 days prior to application of the water deficit and salinity stresses. Water deficit treatments received no irrigation for 5 days, and salinity treatments received 1.0 L of 240-mM salt water per day for the duration of 5-day sampling. Every day after the stress was imposed, plant leaves were collected and immediately analyzed by a hand-held Raman spectrometer. RS and chemometrics could identify control and stressed (either water deficit or salinity) susceptible plants with 95% and 80% accuracy just 1 day after treatment. Water deficit and salinity stressed plants could be differentiated from each other with 87% and 86% accuracy, respectively. In the tolerant accessions at the same timepoint, the identification accuracies were 66%, 65%, 67%, and 69% for control, combined stresses, water deficit, and salinity stresses, respectively. The high selectivity and specificity for presymptomatic identification of abiotic stresses in the susceptible line provide evidence for the potential of Raman-based surveillance in commercial-scale agriculture and digital farming.

Indexed as

groundnutspeanutsplantsRaman spectroscopysalinity stresswater deficit stress

Identifiers

PMID34458666
PMCPMC8377774
OpenAlexW3194542764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.