ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology
An Automatic Deep Learning-Based Workflow for Glioblastoma Survival Prediction Using Preoperative Multimodal MR Images: A Feasibility Study.
Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Application of artificial intelligence in forecasting survival in high-grade glioma: systematic review and meta-analysis involving 79,638 participants.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Survival prediction of glioblastoma patients using machine learning and deep learning: a systematic review.BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- A Review of Artificial Intelligence-Based Systems for Non-Invasive Glioblastoma Diagnosis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Deep learning-based overall survival prediction in patients with glioblastoma: An automatic end-to-end workflow using pre-resection basic structural multiparametric MRIs.Computers in biology and medicine · 2025Article
- Predicting survival in malignant glioma using artificial intelligence.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Scoping review of image-based overall survival prediction in glioma using machine learning.Polish journal of radiology · 2025Review
- End-to-End Multi-task Learning Architecture for Brain Tumor Analysis with Uncertainty Estimation in MRI Images.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- Deep-learning radiomics based on ultrasound can objectively evaluate thyroid nodules and assist in improving the diagnostic level of ultrasound physicians.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Assessment of brain cancer atlas maps with multimodal imaging features.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Review
- Survival and grade of the glioma prediction using transfer learning.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
- Reliability as a Precondition for Trust-Segmentation Reliability Analysis of Radiomic Features Improves Survival Prediction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- AI-Driven Image Analysis in Central Nervous System Tumors-Traditional Machine Learning, Deep Learning and Hybrid Models.Journal of biotechnology and biomedicine · 2022Article
- Brain tumor segmentation using 3D Mask R-CNN for dynamic susceptibility contrast enhanced perfusion imaging.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020Article
- Estimating overall survival of glioblastoma patients using clinical variables, tumor size, and location.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMost radiomic studies use the features extracted from the manually drawn tumor contours for classification or survival prediction. However, large interobserver segmentation variations lead to inconsistent features and hence introduce more challenges in constructing robust prediction models. Here, we proposed an automatic workflow for glioblastoma (GBM) survival prediction based on multimodal magnetic resonance (MR) images. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two hundred eighty-five patients with glioma (210 GBM, 75 low-grade glioma) were included. One hundred sixty-three of the patients with GBM had overall survival data. Every patient had 4 preoperative MR images and manually drawn tumor contours. A 3-dimensional convolutional neural network, VGG-Seg, was trained and validated using 122 patients with glioma for automatic GBM segmentation. The trained VGG-Seg was applied to the remaining 163 patients with GBM to generate their autosegmented tumor contours. The handcrafted and deep learning (DL)-based radiomic features were extracted from the autosegmented contours using explicitly designed algorithms and a pretrained convolutional neural network, respectively. One hundred sixty-three patients with GBM were randomly split into training (n = 122) and testing (n = 41) sets for survival analysis. Cox regression models were trained to construct the handcrafted and DL-based signatures. The prognostic powers of the 2 signatures were evaluated and compared.
resultsThe VGG-Seg achieved a mean Dice coefficient of 0.86 across 163 patients with GBM for GBM segmentation. The handcrafted signature achieved a C-index of 0.64 (95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.73), whereas the DL-based signature achieved a C-index of 0.67 (95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.77). Unlike the handcrafted signature, the DL-based signature successfully stratified testing patients into 2 prognostically distinct groups.
conclusionsThe VGG-Seg generated accurate GBM contours from 4 MR images. The DL-based signature achieved a numerically higher C-index than the handcrafted signature and significant patient stratification. The proposed automatic workflow demonstrated the potential of improving patient stratification and survival prediction in patients with GBM.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.