Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34458635›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2021

Midwives and women's perspectives on family planning in Jordan: human rights, gender equity, decision-making and power dynamics.

Nihaya A Al-Sheyab, Mohannad Al Nsour, Yousef S Khader, Hind Yousif, Mohammad S Alyahya, Hana Taha, Marco Bardus, Malika Al Kattan, Mirwais Amiri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nihaya A Al-SheyabAllied Medical Sciences, Department/Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Faculty of Nursing, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box (3030), Irbid 22110, Jordan.
Mohannad Al NsourGlobal Health Development (GHD), Eastern Mediterranean Public Health Network (EMPHNET), 4 Abu Al Ataheya St. apt 5, Sport City, Amman, Jordan.
Yousef S KhaderDepartment of Community Medicine, Public Health and Family Medicine/ Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science & Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan.
Hind YousifGlobal Health Development (GHD), Eastern Mediterranean Public Health Network (EMPHNET), 4 Abu Al Ataheya St. apt 5, Sport City, Amman, Jordan.
Mohammad S AlyahyaFaculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box (3030), Irbid 22110, Jordan.
Hana TahaGlobal Health Development (GHD), Eastern Mediterranean Public Health Network (EMPHNET), 4 Abu Al Ataheya St. apt 5, Sport City, Amman, Jordan.
Marco BardusDepartment of Health Promotion & Community Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Van Dyck - Room 302, P.O. Box (11-0236), Riad El-Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon.
Malika Al KattanDepartment of Health Promotion & Community Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Van Dyck - Room 302, P.O. Box (11-0236), Riad El-Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon.
Mirwais AmiriGlobal Health Development (GHD), Eastern Mediterranean Public Health Network (EMPHNET), 4 Abu Al Ataheya St. apt 5, Sport City, Amman, Jordan.
Eastern Mediterranean Public Health Network · JOJordan University of Science and Technology · JOAmerican University of Beirut · LB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study explored midwives' and Jordanian and Syrian women's perceptions towards family planning (FP) counseling and the process of FP decision making mechanism to provide evidence for expanding the access and improving the quality and utilization of FP services in Jordan.

methodsExplorative qualitative study that purposively recruited 24 women for 4 focus group discussions (FDGs) and 17 midwives for in-depth interviews from two governorates in Jordan. The transcribed narratives were subjected to deductive content analysis.

resultsTwo themes were extracted from the narratives: The power dynamics in FP decision-making process and the barriers and motivators of FP decision making. The first theme was built on the perceived influence of gender equity and social pressures and gender-based violence on FP decision making. The second theme was constructed on the respondents' beliefs about reproductive health including FP as a human right and their perceptions of the obstacles and facilitators of FP Decision Making. Overall, husbands have an influential role, and perhaps the final say, in deciding whether to use FP services or not as well as the type of method to use. However, wives must initiate the family planning conversation with her husband and do so in a way that will be pleasing to the husband. Whether the husband agrees with the wife's idea to use family planning and gives her permission and funds for use, depends largely on her presentation of the idea, her husband's education level, and his personality.

conclusionsThis study revealed several relevant issues that play a role in Jordanian and Syrian women's decision to seek FP services. While cultural and social norms related to family planning and decision making continue to exert pressure on women, women have a deep interest in continuing to broaden their knowledge about family planning services. Engaging men and incorporating digital technology in family planning counselling has the potential to improve shared FP decision-making process among Jordanian couples and overcome some of the barriers.

Indexed as

Family planningGender equityHuman rightsPower dynamics

Identifiers

PMID34458635
PMCPMC8379452
OpenAlexW3195948896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.