ArticleFood and waterborne parasitology2021
A review of testing and assurance methods for
Article in Food and waterborne parasitology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epidemiology, frost resistance, and emerging species-specific diagnostics for Trichinella nativa: Current evidence and future priorities.Veterinary world · 2026Review
- First assessment of the prevalence ofThe veterinary quarterly · 2025Article
- Molecular diagnosis of Trichinella spp.: current status and future prospects.Parasitology research · 2025Review
- Regulation of dendritic cell immune function and maturation by the recombinant antigen p53 of Trichinella spiralis.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Effect of Nematodes-Bacteria Complex Metabolites on Cancer and Tumor Progression.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Over a century of progress onFood and waterborne parasitology · 2024Review
- Genetic identification ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Foodborne Parasites and Their Complex Life Cycles Challenging Food Safety in Different Food Chains.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Epidemiology ofFood and waterborne parasitology · 2022Article
- Validation of the Magnetic Stirrer Method for the Detection ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While global cases of trichinellosis have fallen since pork regulation began, the disease remains a danger to pork and animal game consumers as well as a liability to producers. Managing food safety risk and supporting agricultural trade requires cost-effective and sensitive diagnostic methods. Several means exist to inspect pork for parasitic infections. Here, we review literature concerning the sensitivity, specificity, and cost of these methods. We found that artificial digestion coupled with optical microscopy to be the best method for verification of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.