Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34458555›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)2021

Identifying relevant outcomes in the progression of Alzheimer's disease; what do patients and care partners want to know about prognosis?

Arenda Mank, Ingrid S van Maurik, Els D Bakker, Esther M M van de Glind, Linus Jönsson, Milica G Kramberger, Petr Novak, Ana Diaz, Dianne Gove, Philip Scheltens and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Anticipating the Future in an Uncertain Present: How Individuals Living With Medically Unexplained Cognitive Complaints Value Biomarker-Based Prognostics.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Tau-PET is superior to phospho-tau when predicting cognitive decline in symptomatic AD patients.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Arenda MankAlzheimer Center Amsterdam Department of Neurology VU University Medical Center Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam the Netherlands.
Ingrid S van MaurikAlzheimer Center Amsterdam Department of Neurology VU University Medical Center Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam the Netherlands.
Els D BakkerAlzheimer Center Amsterdam Department of Neurology VU University Medical Center Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam the Netherlands.
Esther M M van de GlindDepartment of Geriatrics Alrijne Ziekenhuis Leiden the Netherlands.
Linus JönssonKarolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden.
Milica G KrambergerCenter for Cognitive Impairments University Medical Centre Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia.
Petr NovakInstitute of Neuroimmunology Slovak Academy of Sciences Bratislava Slovakia.
Ana DiazAlzheimer Europe (AE) Luxembourg City Luxembourg.
Dianne GoveAlzheimer Europe (AE) Luxembourg City Luxembourg.
Philip ScheltensAlzheimer Center Amsterdam Department of Neurology VU University Medical Center Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam the Netherlands.
Wiesje M van der FlierAlzheimer Center Amsterdam Department of Neurology VU University Medical Center Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam the Netherlands.
Leonie N C VisserAlzheimer Center Amsterdam Department of Neurology VU University Medical Center Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrognostic studies in the context of Alzheimer's disease (AD) mainly predicted time to dementia. However, it is questionable whether onset of dementia is the most relevant outcome along the AD disease trajectory from the perspective of patients and their care partners. Therefore, we aimed to identify the most relevant outcomes from the viewpoint of patients and care partners.

methodsWe used a two-step, mixed-methods approach. As a first step we conducted four focus groups in the Netherlands to elicit a comprehensive list of outcomes considered important by patients (

resultsThe top-10 lists of items most frequently mentioned as "most important" by patients and care partners were merged into one core outcome list, comprising 13 items. Both patients and care partners selected outcomes from the category "cognition" most often, followed by items in the categories "functioning and dependency" and "physical health." No items from the category "behavior and neuropsychiatry" and "social environment" ended up in our core list of relevant outcomes.

conclusionWe identified a core list of outcomes relevant to patients and care partner, and found that prognostic information related to cognitive decline, dependency, and physical health are considered most relevant by both patients and their care partners.

Identifiers

PMID34458555
PMCPMC8377775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.