Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34458289›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2021

Risk Factors, Clinical Outcomes, and Prognostic Factors of Bacterial Keratitis: The Nottingham Infectious Keratitis Study.

Darren Shu Jeng Ting, Jessica Cairns, Bhavesh P Gopal, Charlotte Shan Ho, Lazar Krstic, Ahmad Elsahn, Michelle Lister, Dalia G Said, Harminder S Dua

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Darren Shu Jeng TingAcademic Ophthalmology, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Jessica CairnsAcademic Ophthalmology, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Bhavesh P GopalDepartment of Ophthalmology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Charlotte Shan HoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Lazar KrsticDepartment of Ophthalmology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Ahmad ElsahnAcademic Ophthalmology, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Michelle ListerDepartment of Microbiology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Dalia G SaidAcademic Ophthalmology, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Harminder S DuaAcademic Ophthalmology, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Queen's Medical Centre · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBResearch Institute of Ophthalmology · EG

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T001674/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

contact lenscorneal infectioncorneal ulcerdiabetesdry eyemicrobial keratitisocular surface disease

Identifiers

PMID34458289
PMCPMC8385317
OpenAlexW3169580339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.