Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34458144›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Assessment Practice of Patient-Centered Outcomes in Surgical Neuro-Oncology: Survey-Based Recommendations for Clinical Routine.

Carolin Weiss Lucas, Mirjam Renovanz, Johanna Jost, Michael Sabel, Dorothee Wiewrodt, Marion Rapp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carolin Weiss LucasCenter of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Mirjam RenovanzDepartment of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Johanna JostDepartment of Neurosurgery, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster, Germany.
Michael SabelDepartment of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Dorothee WiewrodtDepartment of Neurosurgery, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster, Germany.
Marion RappDepartment of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The psycho-oncological burden related to the diagnosis of an intracranial tumor is often accompanied by neurocognitive deficits and changes in character, overall affecting health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and activities of daily living. Regular administration of adequate screening tools is crucial to ensure a timely detection of needs for support and/or specific interventions. Although efforts have been made to assure the quality of neuro-oncological care, clinical assessment practice of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) remains overall heterogeneous, calling for a concise recommendation tailored to neuro-oncological patients. Therefore, this survey, promoted by the German Society of Neurosurgery, was conducted to evaluate the

Indexed as

brain tumorburdendistresshealth-related quality of life (HRQL)neurocognitionpatient-reported outcome (PRO)screening tools

Identifiers

PMID34458144
PMCPMC8386174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.