ArticleCureus2021
Assessment of the Successful External Cephalic Version Prognostic Parameters Effect on Final Mode of Delivery.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of independent predictors of successful external cephalic version: A retrospective multicenter study.Medicine · 2026Observational
- Reproducibility of Breech Progression Angle: Standardization of Transperineal Measurements and Development of Image-Based Checklist for Quality Control.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- External Cephalic Version-A Chance for Vaginal Delivery at Breech Presentation.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim This study aims to evaluate the prognostic parameters of successful approach for an external cephalic version (ECV) procedure by considering the vaginal delivery as the optimal mode of delivery. Methodology A retrospective cohort study was done during June 2019 in the obstetrics and gynecology department at King Abdulaziz University Hospital. Data were collected between May 2009 and May 2019 and included all pregnant women who were candidates for the ECV. The primary objective was to assess the final mode of delivery in relation to the outcome of ECV followed by the secondary objective which was the prognostic parameters of the ECV procedure (body mass index, amniotic fluid index, parity, estimated fetal weight). Additional variables were maternal age, placental position and ethnicity. Results We have studied 86 pregnant women with ECV attempts the overall ECV success rate was for 46 women (59.7%). For the final mode of delivery, after a successful ECV procedure, 40 women (87%) whom had spontaneous vaginal delivery, in association to successful ECV, the prognostic parameters recorded the highest success rate were multiparous 35 (76.1%), body mass index between 25 and 29.9 (53.1%), women older than 30 years old (60.9%), gestational age between 37 to 39.6 weeks (56.5%). Posterior placental location 55.6%, estimated fetal weight more than 2500 (73.9%). Conclusion Successful ECV cases have recorded a significant increase in the incidence of spontaneous vaginal delivery and the outcome of ECV which is affected by many prognostic parameters such as parity, maternal age, gestational age, body mass index, amniotic fluid index (AFI) and estimated fetal weight (EFW).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.