Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34458013›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids2021

The role of SAXS and molecular simulations in 3D structure elucidation of a DNA aptamer against lung cancer.

Dmitry Morozov, Vladimir Mironov, Roman V Moryachkov, Irina A Shchugoreva, Polina V Artyushenko, Galina S Zamay, Olga S Kolovskaya, Tatiana N Zamay, Alexey V Krat, Dmitry S Molodenskiy and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Successes and Failures of Static Aptamer-Target 3D Docking Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. An overview of structural approaches to study therapeutic RNAs.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Dmitry MorozovNanoscience Center and Department of Chemistry, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland.
Vladimir MironovDepartment of Chemistry, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Roman V MoryachkovLaboratory of Physics of Magnetic Phenomena, Kirensky Institute of Physics, 50/38 Akademgorodok, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia.
Irina A ShchugorevaLaboratory for Digital Controlled Drugs and Theranostics, Federal Research Center "Krasnoyarsk Science Center SB RAS," 50 Akademgorodok, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia.
Polina V ArtyushenkoLaboratory for Digital Controlled Drugs and Theranostics, Federal Research Center "Krasnoyarsk Science Center SB RAS," 50 Akademgorodok, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia.
Galina S ZamayLaboratory for Digital Controlled Drugs and Theranostics, Federal Research Center "Krasnoyarsk Science Center SB RAS," 50 Akademgorodok, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia.
Olga S KolovskayaLaboratory for Digital Controlled Drugs and Theranostics, Federal Research Center "Krasnoyarsk Science Center SB RAS," 50 Akademgorodok, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia.
Tatiana N ZamayKrasnoyarsk State Medical University, 1 Partizana Zheleznyaka, Krasnoyarsk 660022, Russia.
Alexey V KratKrasnoyarsk State Medical University, 1 Partizana Zheleznyaka, Krasnoyarsk 660022, Russia.
Dmitry S MolodenskiyEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Hamburg Outstation, Notkestrasse 85, 22603 Hamburg, Germany.
Vladimir N ZabludaLaboratory of Physics of Magnetic Phenomena, Kirensky Institute of Physics, 50/38 Akademgorodok, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia.
Dmitry V VeprintsevKrasnoyarsk State Medical University, 1 Partizana Zheleznyaka, Krasnoyarsk 660022, Russia.
Alexey E SokolovLaboratory of Physics of Magnetic Phenomena, Kirensky Institute of Physics, 50/38 Akademgorodok, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia.
Ruslan A ZukovKrasnoyarsk State Medical University, 1 Partizana Zheleznyaka, Krasnoyarsk 660022, Russia.
Maxim V BerezovskiDepartment of Chemistry and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Ottawa, 10 Marie-Curie, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada.
Felix N TomilinLaboratory of Physics of Magnetic Phenomena, Kirensky Institute of Physics, 50/38 Akademgorodok, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia.
Dmitri G FedorovResearch Center for Computational Design of Advanced Functional Materials, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba 305-8568, Japan.
Yuri AlexeevComputational Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, USA.
Anna S KichkailoLaboratory for Digital Controlled Drugs and Theranostics, Federal Research Center "Krasnoyarsk Science Center SB RAS," 50 Akademgorodok, Krasnoyarsk 660036, Russia.
Krasnoyarsk State Medical University · RUInstitute of Physics · RUSiberian Federal University · RUArgonne National Laboratory · USEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory · DELomonosov Moscow State University · RUNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology · JPUniversity of Jyväskylä · FIUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aptamers are short, single-stranded DNA or RNA oligonucleotide molecules that function as synthetic analogs of antibodies and bind to a target molecule with high specificity. Aptamer affinity entirely depends on its tertiary structure and charge distribution. Therefore, length and structure optimization are essential for increasing aptamer specificity and affinity. Here, we present a general optimization procedure for finding the most populated atomistic structures of DNA aptamers. Based on the existed aptamer LC-18 for lung adenocarcinoma, a new truncated LC-18 (LC-18t) aptamer LC-18t was developed. A three-dimensional (3D) shape of LC-18t was reported based on small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) experiments and molecular modeling by fragment molecular orbital or molecular dynamic methods. Molecular simulations revealed an ensemble of possible aptamer conformations in solution that were in close agreement with measured SAXS data. The aptamer LC-18t had stronger binding to cancerous cells in lung tumor tissues and shared the binding site with the original larger aptamer. The suggested approach reveals 3D shapes of aptamers and helps in designing better affinity probes.

Indexed as

aptamerfragment molecular orbitallung adenocarcinomamolecular dynamicsmolecular simulationsoligonucleotideSAXSsmall-angle X-ray scatteringspatial structuretertiary structure

Identifiers

PMID34458013
PMCPMC8379633
OpenAlexW3190330215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.