ArticleMedical science educator2021
Novel Spaced Repetition Flashcard System for the In-training Examination for Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Article in Medical science educator, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of spaced repetition for clinical problem solving amongst undergraduate medical students studying paediatrics in Pakistan.BMC medical education · 2024Trial
- Institute-created electronic flashcards, associated development effort, and exam performance in pharmacology education in human medicine.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Exploring the effectiveness and awareness of Anki flashcard application on medical student's academic performance: a cross-sectional study from Saudi Arabia.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Unboxing Electronic Flashcards: An Introduction to the Design Elements of Anki for Medical Education (DEAME) Framework.Medical science educator · 2025Article
- Flashcards versus educational video: A comparison in order to promote laparoscopic surgical instrument learning.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of Electronic Flashcards for Undergraduate Medical Students in Musculoskeletal Sciences.Cureus · 2025Article
- Article
- Implementation of Spaced Repetition by First-Year Medical Students: a Retrospective Comparison Based on Summative Exam Performance.Medical science educator · 2023Article
- A Cohort Study Assessing the Impact of Anki as a Spaced Repetition Tool on Academic Performance in Medical School.Medical science educator · 2023Article
- Flashcards: The Preferred Online Game-Based Study Tool Self-Selected by Students to Review Medical Histology Image Content.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Review
- Attitudes of an international student cohort to the Quizlet study system employed in an advanced clinical health care review course.Education and information technologies · 2023Article
- Enhanced Learning and Retention of Medical Knowledge Using the Mobile Flash card Application Anki.Medical science educator · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionElectronic flashcards allow repeated information exposure over time along with active recall. It is increasingly used for self-study by medical students but remains poorly implemented for graduate medical education. The primary goal of this study was to determine whether a flashcard system enhances preparation for the in-training examination in obstetrics and gynecology (ob-gyn) conducted by the Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology (CREOG).
methodsOb-gyn residents at Duke University were included in this study. A total of 883 electronic flashcards were created and distributed. CREOG scores and flashcard usage statistics, generated internally by interacting with the electronic flashcard system, were collected after the 2019 exam. The primary outcome was study aid usage and satisfaction. The secondary outcome was the impact of flashcard usage on CREOG exam scores.
resultsOf the 32 residents, 31 (97%) participated in this study. Eighteen (58%) residents used the study's flashcards with a median of 276 flashcards studied over a median of 3.7 h. All of the flashcard users found the study aid helpful, and all would recommend them to another ob-gyn resident. Using the flashcards to study for the 2019 CREOG exam appeared to correlate with improvement in scores from 2018 to 2019, but did not achieve statistical significance after adjusting for post-graduate year (beta coefficient = 10.5; 95% confidence interval = - 0.60,21.7; DISCUSSION: This flashcard resource was well received by ob-gyn residents for in-training examination preparation, though it was not significantly correlated with improvement in CREOG scores after adjusting for post-graduate year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.