Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34457959›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2021

Some Learning Theories for Medical Educators.

Hongmei Dong, Jonathan Lio, Renslow Sherer, Ivy Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparison of progress test performance between PBL and TBL curricula.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hongmei DongDepartment of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2205-3467
Jonathan LioDepartment of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL USA.
Renslow ShererDepartment of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL USA.
Ivy JiangDepartment of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perspectives on the nature of learning influence decisions about curriculum design, teaching and learning strategies, and assessment of students. Current literature on medical education suggests that medical teachers have much interest in using theories to inform their practice. This article describes the following learning theories that have been discussed to various degrees in previous literature on medical education: cognitivism, constructivism, experiential learning, adult learning, self-directed learning, community of practice and situated learning, cognitive apprenticeship, and reflective learning. Each theory is explained in sufficient detail to help readers grasp its essence. Then, medical education literature is cited to show how the theory has been used or can be used to guide practice in medical education. Finally, this article analyzes the problem-based learning approach as an example to illustrate how the theories may be reflected in practice. Throughout the introduction of the various theories, this article aims at their application in medical education and attempts to draw connections among the theories rather than represent them as unrelated or competing ideas.

Indexed as

Learning theoriesLearning theories for medical educatorsMedical educationMedical education practicePerspectives on learningTheoretical approaches to learning

Identifiers

PMID34457959
PMCPMC8368150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.