ArticleMedical science educator2021
Understanding Excellence: a Qualitative Analysis of High-Performing Learner Study Strategies.
Article in Medical science educator, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Teaching infectiology through electronic adaptative flashcards on mobile phones to medical residents: randomized controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2025Trial
- Physical exercise and academic performance among students in the medical field at Jordanian Universities.PloS one · 2026Article
- Unboxing Electronic Flashcards: An Introduction to the Design Elements of Anki for Medical Education (DEAME) Framework.Medical science educator · 2025Article
- Learning together: a narrative review of external resources for medical education through a shared student-faculty lens.Annals of medicine · 2025Review
- The Impact of Learning Approach and Study Habits on Student Performance in an Undergraduate Human Anatomy Course.Medical science educator · 2025Article
- Using Virtual Reality to Assist Students at Academic Risk in Human Anatomy.Medical science educator · 2025Article
- High- and low-achieving international medical students' perceptions of the factors influencing their academic performance at Chinese universities.Medical education online · 2024Article
- Implementation of Spaced Repetition by First-Year Medical Students: a Retrospective Comparison Based on Summative Exam Performance.Medical science educator · 2023Article
- Article
- Attendance of Near-Peer Tutoring Sessions Improves Academic Performance of First-Year Medical Students.Medical science educator · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRemediation in medical education tends to focus on the struggling learner. However, understanding successful learners may provide valuable insights to problematic academic behavior. This study explored core study strategies reported by high-performing medical school students.
methodIn the Fall of 2018 and 2019, high-performing first- and second-year medical students, defined as those who had performed over 90% on a national standardized assessment, were requested via e-mail to describe the study strategies that they believe contributed to their success. Student responses were analyzed using a template-driven approach, which drew upon common frameworks from cognitive learning theory.
resultsThirty-seven high-performing students provided brief unstructured descriptions of their study strategies. Retrieval practice-the cognitive learning strategy of attempting to draw out information to active recall, typically through means of self-quizzing, practice questions, or flashcards-was the most commonly endorsed strategy, followed by spaced repetition. Use of outside commercial resources was commonly referenced, and approximately one-third endorsed a perception that some form of regularly practiced self-care contributed to their academic success. DISCUSSION: Retrieval practice, particularly combined with some form of spaced repetition, is often attributed as contributing to the success of high-performing learners. The use of commercial resources bears further exploration and consideration. Finally, the finding that self-care was identified as a contribution to academic performance goes beyond a focus on self-care solely for medical student well-being. This is an important distinction for both medical education and future research in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.