ReviewMedical science educator2021
Feedback Credibility in Healthcare Education: a Systematic Review and Synthesis.
Review in Medical science educator, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- User Acceptance of an AI-Powered Medical History-Taking Training System Among Undergraduate Medical Students: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- How Learning Culture Influences the Survivability of an Online Feedback Tool.Perspectives on medical education · 2026Article
- Cultural influences on Asian health profession trainees seeking and receiving feedback: a scoping review.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Bridging patterns and practice: Cultivating shared understanding in health professions education.Medical education · 2025Article
- Using Kane's validity framework to examine the implications of feedback in simulation-based assessments.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2025Article
- Interprofessional Educational Interventions to Improve Pharmacological Knowledge and Prescribing Competency in Medical Students and Trainees: A Scoping Review.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Resident and Attending Physician Perspectives on Indirect Observation in Competency-Based Medical Education.Journal of graduate medical education · 2025Article
- Building bridges in the emergency room: educational alliances between junior residents and attending physicians.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Redefining medical education: harnessing the power of patient feedback.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- "The feedback dilemma"-provider and learner perspectives regarding the barriers and facilitators for giving and receiving feedback in medical education: A parallel mixed methods approach.Journal of education and health promotion · 2024Article
- Feedback that Lands: Exploring How Residents Receive and Judge Feedback During Entrustable Professional Activities.Perspectives on medical education · 2023Article
- Patients as Feedback Providers: Exploring Medical Students' Credibility Judgments.Perspectives on medical education · 2023Article
- Learning pediatric emergency medicine over time: A realist evaluation of a longitudinal pediatric emergency medicine clinical experience.AEM education and training · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to systematically review and synthesize factors that influence learners' perceptions of credibility when feedback is provided by an authority figure in a healthcare environment.
methodsThis study reviewed literature from medicine, psychology, and education using systematic review and qualitative synthesis methods. In a multi-step process, major electronic bibliographic databases were searched for relevant studies until October 2020.
resultsThe search identified 9216 articles. A total of 134 abstracts underwent full-text review. Of these, 22 articles met inclusion criteria. The studies were heterogenous and the majority utilized a qualitative design with interviews and focus groups. A few studies employed mixed methodology (
conclusionAs programs implement major educational change initiatives to create more formative assessment practices, feedback will become even more crucial. The four main themes identified are important factors that contribute to the perception of feedback credibility. While the factors are described independently, they may be viewed as interrelated and the association between these factors and feedback may be driven more by learning culture than each characteristic. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-020-01167-w.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.