Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34457920›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2021

Study of Live Lecture Attendance, Student Perceptions and Expectations.

Johnathan Emahiser, John Nguyen, Cheryl Vanier, Amina Sadik

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Enhancing Oncology Education: Effects of a Structured Enrichment Elective on Medical Student Engagement and Career Intentions.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Johnathan EmahiserThird Year Medical Student (OMSIII), College of Osteopathic Medicine, Touro University Nevada, Henderson, NV USA.
John NguyenThird Year Medical Student (OMSIII), College of Osteopathic Medicine, Touro University Nevada, Henderson, NV USA.
Cheryl VanierChief Research Officer, Department of Research, Institutional Review Board (IRB) Chair, Touro University Nevada, Henderson, NV USA.
Amina SadikAmina Sadik, Basic Sciences Department, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Touro University Nevada, NV Henderson, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3238-4590
Touro University Nevada · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Declining lecture attendance has been an ongoing concern for educators involved in undergraduate medical education. A survey was developed (a) to gain insight into the reasons students skipped class, (b) to identify the type of study materials they were using, and (c) to determine what they thought would motivate them to come to class. The survey was sent to 317 first-year and second-year medical students, and 145 (45%) responded. Only 63% of first-year students and 53% of second-year students attended any lectures that were not mandatory. The attendance was higher for students who aspired to less competitive specialties such as pediatrics and family medicine. The most popular reasons for not coming to class were related to the efficiency of information intake and instructor or class style. The most heavily used resources (> 60%) were materials or recorded lectures provided by the instructor. The second-year students also heavily used outside study materials for Board exams, such as Pathoma (50%). Students' ideas for what might increase their attendance suggest that they perceive that the lectures may not prepare them for Board exams, and they would like faculty to address Board related content more often in class and on assessments. Respondents also suggested that teaching practices might be improved through faculty development. Faculty awareness of and references to Board exam content, embedded in strong teaching practices, may help students find more value in live lectures. Carefully designed active learning sessions may change students' minds regarding the relevance and value of these sessions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-021-01236-8.

Indexed as

Active learningAttendanceLectureMedical studentPre-clinicalUndergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID34457920
PMCPMC8368907
OpenAlexW3132795423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.