ArticleMedical science educator2021
Learning How to Order Imaging Tests and Make Subsequent Clinical Decisions: a Randomized Study of the Effectiveness of a Virtual Learning Environment for Medical Students.
Article in Medical science educator, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- What works in radiology education for medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical education · 2024Pooled it
- Exploring medical students' metacognitive and regulatory dimensions of diagnostic problem solving.Medical education online · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RATIONALE AND
objectivesTwo critical skills that medical students must acquire during undergraduate education are the ability to order imaging tests and make clinical decisions based on their results. We implemented an e-learning course in Moodle specifically designed to teach these skills to medical students. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of our course. MATERIAL AND
methodsWe randomized 26 undergraduate medical students to an experimental group that had access to the virtual learning environment and a control group that did not. Three weeks after the course, we evaluated its effectiveness through a blinded objective structured clinical examination. To avoid any bias in favor of the experimental group, the assessment considered scores on two pre-specified subscales: one related to the contents of the course and the other to new clinical scenarios.
resultsStudents that completed the e-course performed better overall than controls (mean score ± standard deviation 59.3 ± 6.2 vs 41.8 ± 10.2,
conclusionsThrough an
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.