Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34457882›Full record

ReviewMedical science educator2021

A Rapid Review of Prescribing Education Interventions.

Usmaan Omer, Evangelos Danopoulos, Martin Veysey, Paul Crampton, Gabrielle Finn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical science educator, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. What should be updated in the WHO guide to good prescribing?European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  3. Global under- and overprescribing of drugs-a scoping review.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Does formative assessment help students to acquire prescribing skills?European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Usmaan OmerHealth Professions Education Unit, Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5226-2331
Evangelos DanopoulosHealth Professions Education Unit, Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK.
Martin VeyseyHealth Professions Education Unit, Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK.
Paul CramptonHealth Professions Education Unit, Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK.
Gabrielle FinnHealth Professions Education Unit, Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany studies conducted on the causes and nature of prescribing errors have highlighted the inadequacy of teaching and training of prescribers. Subsequently, a rapid review was undertaken to update on the nature and effectiveness of educational interventions aimed at improving the prescribing skills and competencies.

methodsTwenty-two studies taking place between 2009 and 2019 were identified across nine databases. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: This review reinforced the importance of the WHO Guide to Good Prescribing to prescribing curriculum design as well as the effectiveness of small group teaching. However, it also highlighted the lack of innovation in prescribing education and lack of longitudinal follow-up regarding the effectiveness of prescribing education interventions.

Indexed as

Medical studentsNon-medical prescribers: curriculum designPrescribing educationWHO Guide to Good Prescribing

Identifiers

PMID34457882
PMCPMC8368780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.