ReviewMedical science educator2020
Perception of Technology-Enhanced Learning by Medical Students: an Integrative Review.
Review in Medical science educator, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- E-learning in health professions education during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.Journal of educational evaluation for health professions · 2021Pooled it
- A Large-Scale Multispecialty Evaluation of Web-Based Simulation in Medical Microbiology Laboratory Education: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR medical education · 2025Trial
- Article
- Exploring faculty and student perceptions of online surgical teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study.Journal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa · 2026Article
- Exploring medical students' preferences and challenges in clinical pharmacology education: insights and improvement strategies.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- An e-Learning Course to Train General Practitioners in Planetary Health: Pilot Intervention Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- A comparative study on the effectiveness of online and in-class team-based learning on student performance and perceptions in virtual simulation experiments.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Cross-sectional study of attitudes toward online continuing dental education in Libya during the COVID-19 pandemic.PloS one · 2024Article
- Radiography education in 2022 and beyond - Writing the history of the present: A narrative review.Radiography (London, England : 1995) · 2023Review
- Be in the Digital Room Where it Happens, Part II: Social Media for Neurology Educators.Child neurology openReview
- Online assessment in undergraduate medical education: Challenges and solutions from a LMIC university.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review aims to explore the perception of technology-enhanced learning by medical students. From the initial 2947 records found, 38 studies from journals indexed in the Web of Science database were included after screening. Several main topics were isolated, based on a thematic analysis: student's attitude towards e-learning and modern technologies in medical education; social networks, video, and mobile devices as information source and communication tool; and barriers to the use of technologies in medical education. The results have shown that a positive attitude towards technologies in medical education and learning is prevalent among students. The popularity of blended learning was confirmed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.