Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34457802›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2020

Simulation 2.0: Integrating Basic Scientists and Clinicians in a Simulation Environment.

Sathyanarayan Sudhanthar, Matthew Emery, Katherine Keller, Robin DeMuth, Dianne Wagner, Michael Borgeld

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sathyanarayan SudhantharDepartment of Pediatrics and Human Development, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, B220 Clinical Center, 788 Service Rd, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9586-1759
Matthew EmeryCollege of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA.
Katherine KellerCollege of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA.
Robin DeMuthCollege of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA.
Dianne WagnerCollege of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA.
Michael BorgeldCollege of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA.
Michigan State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increasing number of medical schools are implementing curricular changes that better integrate clinical and basic sciences throughout all four years of medical school. One of the most frequently cited reasons is to improve medical student clinical reasoning skills while simultaneously aiming to decrease the attrition of basic science knowledge. Multiple pedagogical strategies have been explored to achieve this goal. We have found that simulation is a viable medium to integrate basic science within standardized patient encounters for early medical students.

Indexed as

Clinical teachingHuman patient simulationIntegration of basic sciencesPre-clinical medical educationSimulationTeaching methods

Identifiers

PMID34457802
PMCPMC8368842
OpenAlexW3045774981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.