Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34457789›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2020

Example-Based Learning as a Guide for Revising a Peer-Reviewed Manuscript.

Kevin S Tang, Derrick L Cheng, Wen-Chih Wu, Paul B Greenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kevin S TangThe Program in Liberal Medical Education, Brown University, Providence, RI USA.
Derrick L ChengThe Program in Liberal Medical Education, Brown University, Providence, RI USA.
Wen-Chih WuDivision of Cardiology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI USA.
Paul B GreenbergSection of Ophthalmology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Publishing medical research is an increasingly competitive process for junior researchers. One critical step is revising a manuscript with editorial team feedback. This article's purpose is to utilize a novel example-based learning approach to provide trainees and junior faculty with ten steps on how to successfully navigate the manuscript peer-review process. To this end, each step in the proposed guide is correlated with the authors' most recent publication experience, with key manuscript and editor response letter versions made available through an open-access digital repository.

Indexed as

Example-based learningKnowledge acquisitionMedical student researchPeer-review publicationTeaching methods

Identifiers

PMID34457789
PMCPMC8368839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.