ArticleMedical science educator2020
Resident Training on Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase: a National Survey.
Article in Medical science educator, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMethylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) is an enzyme important in folate metabolism. Genetic polymorphisms of MTHFR have potential clinical implications, particularly in treating mental disorders, where a biologically active form of metafolin is FDA approved in the treatment of major depressive disorder and schizophrenia. Therefore, residents in a variety of specialties must understand the link between genetic polymorphisms of MTHFR and clinical disorders.
objectiveTo identify current gaps in residency curricula with regards to the MTHFR gene.
methodsUsing a snowball sampling method, a national online survey was sent to residency program directors in family medicine, internal medicine, and psychiatry to be forwarded to their corresponding residents. Data was collected between April 5, 2019, and May 14, 2019. Statistical tests included a Pearson chi-square test. Qualitative content analysis for open item responses was conducted in which recurring keywords and phrases were summarized. The primary outcome of interest was a dichotomous question: Does your curriculum teach about MTHFR?
resultsThe results showed that many of residency programs surveyed do not include MTHFR in their courses (family medicine 153/166, 92%; internal medicine 135/151, 89%; psychiatry 70/90, 78%) and a majority of residents are unaware of the clinical associations of MTHFR genetic polymorphisms with cardiovascular diseases and psychiatric disorders.
conclusionsWhile many residents were aware of the MTHFR gene, knowledge about the gene was minimal and many curricula do not include MTHFR as part of their program. Therefore, we recommend residency training programs assess their level of training on MTHFR and its genetic polymorphisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.