Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34457784›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2020

Making a Lecture Stick: the Effect of Spaced Instruction on Knowledge Retention in Medical Education.

Marnix C J Timmer, Paul Steendijk, Sandra M Arend, Marjolein Versteeg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Systematic review of distributed practice and retrieval practice in health professions education.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marnix C J TimmerCenter for Innovation in Medical Education, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9575-2293
Paul SteendijkCenter for Innovation in Medical Education, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Sandra M ArendDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marjolein VersteegCenter for Innovation in Medical Education, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPoor knowledge retention is a persistent problem among medical students. This challenging issue may be addressed by optimizing frequently used instructional designs, such as lectures. Guided by neuroscientific literature, we designed a spaced learning lecture in which the educator repeats the to-be-learned information using short temporal intervals. We investigated if this modified instructional design could enhance students' retention. MATERIALS AND

methodsSecond-year medical students (

resultsThe average score on the retention test ( DISCUSSION AND

conclusionWe were unable to show increased knowledge retention after the spaced lecture compared with the traditional lecture. Based on these findings, we provide recommendations for further research. Ultimately, we aim for optimized spaced learning designs to facilitate learning in the medical curriculum and to help educate health professionals with a solid knowledge base.

Indexed as

Educational neuroscienceInstructional designMedical educationSpaced learningSpacing effect

Identifiers

PMID34457784
PMCPMC8368805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.