Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34457773›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2020

Exploring the Hidden Curriculum's Impact on Medical Students: Professionalism, Identity Formation and the Need for Transparency.

Megan E L Brown, Oluwafemi Coker, Annabel Heybourne, Gabrielle M Finn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring the Hidden Curriculum in Undergraduate Oncology Teaching.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Megan E L BrownHealth Professions Education Unit, Hull York Medical School, University of York, John Hughlings Jackson Building, University Road, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9334-0922
Oluwafemi CokerHealth Professions Education Unit, Hull York Medical School, University of York, John Hughlings Jackson Building, University Road, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD UK.
Annabel HeybourneHealth Professions Education Unit, Hull York Medical School, University of York, John Hughlings Jackson Building, University Road, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD UK.
Gabrielle M FinnHealth Professions Education Unit, Hull York Medical School, University of York, John Hughlings Jackson Building, University Road, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0419-694X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hidden curriculum within medical education has been a topic of recent debate. Consensus opinion regarding the continued relevance of this term, what constitutes the hidden curriculum, and the nature of its impact do not exist. Further research is required to contribute to this debate. This work sets out to investigate which factors beyond taught cognitive knowledge influence medical students in clinical and educational environments and examine how this occurs. Semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted with 39 students from one UK medical school. Fourteen faculty were interviewed individually to triangulate data. Data were analysed using constructivist thematic analysis, informed by grounded theory convention. The presence of the hidden curriculum was clearly demonstrated, acting through role modelling, organizational culture, stereotyping and professional dress. Mentioned frequently were the influences of the hidden curriculum on student professionalism and identity development. Professionalism was perceived as being negatively impacted by the hidden curriculum and seen as an imposition from senior faculty to control students. Students believe medical identity formation begins prior to medical school, in a process known as "anticipatory socialization", a previously unstudied identity transition. Students felt covert institutional agendas negatively impacted their identity, pushing them further from the identity their institution was encouraging them to acquire. Key messages for educators include the need to explore the hidden curriculum through discussion with students. Improving transparency of organizational culture may allow students to interpret institutional agendas in the way institutions formally intend, reducing orthogonal interpretations of organizational culture and subsequent impact upon identity formation.

Indexed as

Anticipatory socializationHidden curriculumMedical studentsProfessional identityProfessionalism

Identifiers

PMID34457773
PMCPMC8368648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.