ArticleMedical science educator2020
Harnessing Technology: Using an iPad to Enhance Radiology Medical Student Education.
Article in Medical science educator, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RATIONALE AND
objectivesOur goal was to determine whether use of the iPad would increase the students' radiologic knowledge, aid in their interpretation of imaging exams, and increase learner satisfaction. MATERIAL AND
methodsiPads were pre-populated with ten image data sets, which included plain film, ultrasound, and CT of the head, chest, abdomen, and pelvis. The students, working in small groups, were charged with identifying the salient imaging findings, formulating a differential diagnosis, and choosing the most appropriate imaging modality, if further work-up was necessary. After the student group problem-solved for an hour, a faculty facilitator joined the group and reviewed the cases with them in an interactive fashion. Pre- and post- intervention tests were administered, and statistical analysis was performed.
resultsStudent satisfaction surveys were administered to 125 students in the first 2 years of the study. These scores rated their assessment of the iPad exercise and ranged from 4.6 to 4.9 out of 5. The knowledge evaluation group included 219 students, 110 in the study group and 109 in the control group, in the latter 3 years of the study. The average improvement from the initial to the second test was 1.04 points among the control group and 2.32 among the study group, which was statistically significant (
conclusionWe demonstrate increased learner satisfaction, as well as improved knowledge acquisition and interpretive skills of third year medical students engaged in hands-on learning using iPads.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.