ArticleMedical science educator2020
Perceptions of patients and medical students towards each other in the setting of patient care-a South African perspective.
Article in Medical science educator, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A cross-sectional study on factors influencing patient participation in undergraduate medical education in a public and private hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSouth Africa urgently needs more doctors. We examined perceptions of patients and students to provide evidence for optimum student-patient ratios and substantiate solutions for this dilemma.
methodsWe interviewed 118 patients and invited 120 students to complete a self-administered questionnaire from four specialities in an academic hospital in Johannesburg.
resultsThe total sample size was 238 participants. A total of 91/118 (77%) patients and 78/120 (65%) students were female. Almost all the patients had some level of education, with most patients having received at least a secondary education (71/120). More than half of the students (69/120) were final year students. A third (41/118) of the patients were unaware they were admitted to a teaching hospital. Half of the patients (60/118) thought they had the right to refuse interaction with students. Patients and students preferred smaller groups of between 1-3 and 4-8 students at a bedside tutorial (
conclusionMedical schools should consider patient safeguards while responding to the country's need for more doctors. The Medical Council and medical schools need to draw up professional guidelines on patient-student interactions, including the role of patients in this setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.