ArticleMedical science educator2020
Practical Evidence-Based Medicine at the Student-to-Physician Transition: Effectiveness of an Undergraduate Medical Education Capstone Course.
Article in Medical science educator, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of a Clinical Decision Support System on Team-Based Clinical Quiz Performance Among Japanese Medical Students: A Pre-Post Pilot Study.Journal of general and family medicine · 2026Article
- Using Social Media to Teach About and Engage Residents in Evidence-Based Medicine.Family medicine · 2024Article
- Online education isn't the best choice: evidence-based medical education in the post-epidemic era-a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Efficiency and effectiveness of concise evidence-based medicine training program at a tertiary healthcare institute - Exploring the impact on research output of faculty.Perspectives in clinical researchArticle
- The Impact of Extracurricular Research Training on Palestinian Medical Students' Confidence in Their Research Skills.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMedical information is expanding at exponential rates. Practicing physicians must acquire skills to efficiently navigate large bodies of evidence to answer clinical questions daily. How best to prepare medical students to meet this challenge remains unknown. The authors sought to design, implement, and assess a pragmatic evidence-based medicine (EBM) course engaging students at the transition from undergraduate to graduate medical education. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn elective course was offered during the required 1-month Capstone medical school curriculum. Participants included one hundred sixty-eight graduating fourth-year medical students at Emory University School of Medicine who completed the course from 2012 to 2018. Through interactive didactics, small groups, and independent work, students actively employed various electronic tools to navigate medical literature and engaged in structured critical appraisal of guidelines and meta-analyses to answer clinical questions.
resultsAssessment data was available for 161 of the 168 participants (95.8%). Pre- and post-assessments demonstrated students' significant improvement in perceived and demonstrated EBM knowledge and skills ( DISCUSSION: The Capstone EBM course empowered graduating medical students to comfortably navigate electronic medical resources and accurately appraise summary literature. The objective improvement in knowledge, the perceived improvement in skill, and the subjective comments support this curricular approach to effectively prepare graduating students for pragmatic practice-based learning as resident physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.