ArticleMedical science educator2020
A Qualitative and Semiquantitative Exploration of the Experience of a Rural and Regional Clinical Placement Programme.
Article in Medical science educator, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Medical Students' Self-Perceptions of Harassment During Clinical Placement.Medical science educator · 2024Article
- User Perceptions of Visual Clot in a High-Fidelity Simulation Study: Mixed Qualitative-Quantitative Study.JMIR human factors · 2024Article
- Article
- User Perceptions of Different Vital Signs Monitor Modalities During High-Fidelity Simulation: Semiquantitative Analysis.JMIR human factors · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In many countries, including New Zealand, recruitment of medical practitioners to rural and regional areas is a government priority, yet evidence for what determines career choice remains limited. We studied 19 newly qualified medical practitioners, all of whom had participated in a year-long undergraduate rural or regional placement (the Pūkawakawa Programme). We explored their placement experiences through focus groups and interviews and aimed to determine whether experiential differences existed between those who chose to return to a rural or regional location for early career employment (the Returners) and those who did not (the Non-Returners). Focus group and interview transcripts were a mean (range) length of 6485 (4720-7889) and 3084 (1843-4756) words, respectively, and underwent thematic analysis. We then used semiquantitative analysis to determine the relative dominance of themes and subthemes within our thematic results. Placement experiences were overwhelming positive - only four themes emerged for negative experiences, but five themes and nine subthemes emerged for positive experiences. Many curricular aspects of the placement experience were viewed as similarly positive for Returners and Non-Returners, as were social aspects with fellow students. Hence, positive experiences
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.