Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34457734›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2020

Interprofessional Service Learning in Medical Education: a Year-Over-Year Assessment of Student Feedback.

Malek H Bouzaher, David B Trinkle, R Brock Mutcheson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Malek H BouzaherVirginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, 2 Riverside Circle, Roanoke, VA 24014 USA.
David B TrinkleVirginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, 2 Riverside Circle, Roanoke, VA 24014 USA.
R Brock MutchesonVirginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, 2 Riverside Circle, Roanoke, VA 24014 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community service learning has been extolled as an effective vehicle for interprofessional education based upon studies assessing the short-term impact of these experiences on positive team behaviors and communication skills. Through this study, the authors explore year-over-year student impressions of an interprofessional service learning program to determine whether the short-term successes detailed in prior studies are sustainable over time. Course evaluations were collected from 168 first-year medical students (M1) at Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine (VTCSOM) over a 4-year period beginning in 2013 and ending in 2017. All 238 current and former VTCSOM students were also prospectively surveyed and 87 (37%) responses were received. Study results indicate that first-year medical students consistently find interprofessional service learning opportunities to be valuable with regard to improving understanding of the roles of other health professionals, as well as helping to generate positive team behaviors. However, as students progress through their medical education and beyond, they may perceive the skills learned and obstacles encountered through these opportunities to be less generalizable to a clinical setting. These findings add to a growing body of evidence supporting the efficacy of service learning in interprofessional education. However, they also suggest that a potential divide may exist between the intended goals of these experiences at an administrative level and the team-based behaviors and communication skills that clinical students and practicing physicians use to navigate interprofessional conflict in the workplace.

Indexed as

Curriculum reformInterprofessional educationMedical educationService learning

Identifiers

PMID34457734
PMCPMC8368142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.