ArticleMedical science educator2020
Implementing Personal Mentoring in an Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Program-3-Year Evaluation.
Article in Medical science educator, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of a mentorship program on clinical competency of midwifery students in managing labor and childbirth in Iran: A parallel randomized controlled trial.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
- Differential impact of transfusion guidelines on blood transfusion practices within a health network.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Wellness interventions in surgery: a scoping review.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo empower residents-in-training through personal mentorship from a senior physician who dedicates time and guidance to their personal development and provides professional and emotional support.
methodsA structured model of personal mentoring for residents was designed and implemented in the Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology. The process was assessed by a special-purpose survey constructed and reviewed by established medical mentors. The survey examined residents' attitudes towards personal aspects associated with their residency. The questionnaires were filled out anonymously before launching and 1 and 3 years after initiating the personal mentoring process.
resultsThe residents' reports showed a distinct trend of increased positive attitudes towards the personal mentoring throughout the process. The residents reported on an improvement in the mentors' availability to address personal aspects within the mentoring relationship (empathy, emotional support in deliberations, career guidance, etc.). The general satisfaction with the residency program improved as well.
conclusionsMentoring is a significant element in a comprehensive, multi-dimensional process. Integrating personal mentoring into a residency program, with the focus on interpersonal relational characteristics as empathy, availability, open communication, and guidance, led to improvements in residents' professional development and skills. They also received optimal support and guidance in their professional careers and personal deliberations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.