ArticleMedical science educator2019
Perceived Communication Skills Among Tertiary Care Physicians.
Article in Medical science educator, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesSelf-perception in clinical skills, including communication skills (CS), has been found to provide insights on strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for skill improvement. The present study is aimed at exploring perceived CS among physicians working at a tertiary healthcare level.
methodsPhysicians working at a tertiary hospital based in Saudi Arabia were invited to complete a modified self-questionnaire that assesses CS. Descriptive and association studies were performed. Psychometric properties of the questionnaire were determined.
resultsOut of the 101 participating physicians, 57.2% rated their CS in the range of very good and excellent, but only 30.7% rated themselves as overall excellent. The question item with the highest mean score (score range, 1 to 5) was related to encouraging patients to ask questions (4.2 ± 0.9), while the lowest was for the item that assessed information disclosure (3.8 ± 0.8). Males rated themselves higher than females in the item related to explaining things to patients (
conclusionsBased on physicians' self-rated assessment, less than the third of tertiary care physicians considered themselves as maintaining an excellent level of CS. Future studies are encouraged to examine CS through a multisystem assessment and promote the need for CS training for physicians working at a tertiary care level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.