Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34457401›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2021

Comparison of photoacoustic imaging and histopathological examination in determining the dimensions of 52 human melanomas and nevi

Jenny Hult, Aboma Merdasa, Agnes Pekar-Lukacs, Magne Tordengren Stridh, Azin Khodaverdi, John Albinsson, Bodil Gesslein, Ulf Dahlstrand, Linn Engqvist, Yousef Hamid and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Photoacoustic imaging of periorbital skin cancerBiomedical optics express · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jenny HultDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Ophthalmology, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1503-1139
Aboma MerdasaDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Ophthalmology, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6298-5672
Agnes Pekar-LukacsDepartment of Pathology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Magne Tordengren StridhDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Ophthalmology, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Azin KhodaverdiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, Sweden.
John AlbinssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Ophthalmology, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3106-937X
Bodil GessleinDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Ophthalmology, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Ulf DahlstrandDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Ophthalmology, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6843-7896
Linn EngqvistDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Ophthalmology, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Yousef HamidDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Ophthalmology, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Douglas Larsson AlbèrDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Ophthalmology, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Bertil PerssonDepartment of Dermatology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Tobias ErlövDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, Sweden.
Rafi SheikhDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Ophthalmology, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8289-9114
Magnus CinthioDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0826-8963
Malin MalmsjöDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Ophthalmology, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical excision followed by histopathological examination is the gold standard for the diagnosis and staging of melanoma. Reoperations and unnecessary removal of healthy tissue could be reduced if non-invasive imaging techniques were available for presurgical tumor delineation. However, no technique has gained widespread clinical use to date due to shallow imaging depth or the absence of functional imaging capability. Photoacoustic (PA) imaging is a novel technology that combines the strengths of optical and ultrasound imaging to reveal the molecular composition of tissue at high resolution. Encouraging results have been obtained from previous animal and human studies on melanoma, but there is still a lack of clinical data. This is the largest study of its kind to date, including 52 melanomas and nevi. 3D multiwavelength PA scanning was performed ex vivo, using 59 excitation wavelengths from 680 nm to 970 nm. Spectral unmixing over this broad wavelength range, accounting for the absorption of several tissue chromophores, provided excellent contrast between healthy tissue and tumor. Combining the results of spectral analysis with spatially resolved information provided a map of the tumor borders in greater detail than previously reported. The tumor dimensions determined with PA imaging were strongly correlated with those determined by histopathological examination for both melanomas and nevi.

Identifiers

PMID34457401
PMCPMC8367235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.