ArticleBiomedical optics express2021
Longitudinal monitoring of tumor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors using noninvasive diffuse reflectance spectroscopy.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Design and Validation of a Multimodal Diffuse Reflectance and Spatially Offset Raman Spectroscopy System for In Vivo Applications.Journal of biophotonics · 2025Article
- Noncontact Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy of Synovial Fluid Samples for Rapid Identification of Infections.Journal of biophotonics · 2024Article
- Evaluating differences in optical properties of indolent and aggressive murine breast tumors using quantitative diffuse reflectance spectroscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy of Changes in Tumor Microenvironment in Response to Different Doses of Radiation.Radiation research · 2022Article
- Raman Spectroscopy and Machine Learning Reveals Early Tumor Microenvironmental Changes Induced by Immunotherapy.Cancer research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer treatment. However, there are currently no methods for noninvasively and nondestructively evaluating tumor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. We used diffuse reflectance spectroscopy to monitor in vivo tumor microenvironmental changes in response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in a CT26 murine colorectal cancer model. Mice growing CT26 tumor xenografts were treated with either anti-PD-L1, anti-CTLA-4, a combination of both inhibitors, or isotype control on 3 separate days. Monotherapy with either anti-PD-L1 or anti-CTLA-4 led to a large increase in tumor vascular oxygenation within the first 6 days. Reoxygenation in anti-CTLA-4-treated tumors was due to a combination of increased oxygenated hemoglobin and decreased deoxygenated hemoglobin, pointing to a possible change in tumor oxygen consumption following treatment. Within the anti-PD-L1-treated tumors, reoxygenation was primarily due to an increase in oxygenated hemoglobin with the minimal change in deoxygenated hemoglobin, indicative of a likely increase in tumor perfusion. The tumors in the combined treatment group did not show any significant changes in tumor oxygenation following therapy. These studies demonstrate the sensitivity of diffuse reflectance spectroscopy to tumor microenvironmental changes following immunotherapy and the potential of such non-invasive techniques to determine early tumor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.