Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34457371›Full record

ArticleIntelligent medicine2022

Social media study of public opinions on potential COVID-19 vaccines: informing dissent, disparities, and dissemination.

Hanjia Lyu, Junda Wang, Wei Wu, Viet Duong, Xiyang Zhang, Timothy D Dye, Jiebo Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intelligent medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Public health challenges · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Doctors vs. Nurses: Understanding the Great Divide in Vaccine Hesitancy among Healthcare Workers.Proceedings : ... IEEE International Conference on Big Data. IEEE International Conference on Big Data · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hanjia LyuGoergen Institute for Data Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, United States.
Junda WangDepartment of Computer Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, United States.
Wei WuGoergen Institute for Data Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, United States.
Viet DuongDepartment of Computer Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, United States.
Xiyang ZhangDepartment of Psychology, University of Akron, Akron, Ohio 44325, United States.
Timothy D DyeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York 14642, United States.
Jiebo LuoDepartment of Computer Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

COVID-19Public opinionSocial MediaTwitterVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID34457371
PMCPMC8384764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.