ArticleRoyal Society open science2021
A two-lab direct replication attempt of Southgate, Senju and Csibra (2007).
Article in Royal Society open science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Altercentric Memory Error at 9 Months But Correct Object Memory by 18 Months Revealed in Infants' Pupil.Developmental science · 2025Article
- Deafness, Hearing Loss and the Development of Mental State Reasoning Skills: A Review.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025Article
- Testing theory of mind in large language models and humans.Nature human behaviour · 2024Article
- Do autistic adults spontaneously reason about belief? A detailed exploration of alternative explanations.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Investigating belief understanding in children in a nonverbal ambiguous displacement and communication setting.Journal of experimental child psychology · 2024Article
- Evaluative contexts facilitate implicit mentalizing: relation to the broader autism phenotype and mental health.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Spontaneous theory of mind in autism: are anticipatory gaze and reaction time biases consistent?Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- False belief understanding in deaf children: what are the difficulties?Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- The social roots of self development: from a bodily to an intellectual interpersonal dialogue.Psychological research · 2023Review
- How robust are egocentric and altercentric interference effects in social cognition? a test with explicit and implicit versions of a continuous false belief task.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- The use of gaze to study cognition: limitations, solutions, and applications to animal welfare.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Theory of mind tested by implicit false belief: a simple and full-fledged mental state attribution.The FEBS journal · 2022Review
- Do young children track other's beliefs, or merely their perceptual access? An interactive, anticipatory measure of early theory of mind.Royal Society open science · 2022Article
- Emerging Self-Representation Presents a Challenge When Perspectives Conflict.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2022Article
- A two-lab direct replication attempt of Southgate, Senju and Csibra (2007).Royal Society open science · 2021Article
- Infants in Control-Evidence for Agency in 6- to 10-Months-Old Infants in a Gaze-Contingent Eye Tracking Paradigm.Child developmentArticle
- Humor Styles in Neurodevelopmental Conditions and Their Links to Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Strengths and Difficulties.Autism & developmental language impairmentsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study by Southgate
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.