Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34457319›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2021

Conceptually plausible Bayesian inference in interval timing.

Sarah C Maaß, Joost de Jong, Leendert van Maanen, Hedderik van Rijn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Models of Variability in Probabilistic Causal Judgments.Computational brain & behavior · 2025
    Article
  3. The Bayesian Mutation Sampler Explains Distributions of Causal Judgments.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah C MaaßDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712TS Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8122-6604
Joost de JongDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712TS Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8841-5646
Leendert van MaanenDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9120-1075
Hedderik van RijnDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712TS Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0461-9850

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a world that is uncertain and noisy, perception makes use of optimization procedures that rely on the statistical properties of previous experiences. A well-known example of this phenomenon is the central tendency effect observed in many psychophysical modalities. For example, in interval timing tasks, previous experiences influence the current percept, pulling behavioural responses towards the mean. In Bayesian observer models, these previous experiences are typically modelled by unimodal statistical distributions, referred to as the prior. Here, we critically assess the validity of the assumptions underlying these models and propose a model that allows for more flexible, yet conceptually more plausible, modelling of empirical distributions. By representing previous experiences as a mixture of lognormal distributions, this model can be parametrized to mimic different unimodal distributions and thus extends previous instantiations of Bayesian observer models. We fit the mixture lognormal model to published interval timing data of healthy young adults and a clinical population of aged mild cognitive impairment patients and age-matched controls, and demonstrate that this model better explains behavioural data and provides new insights into the mechanisms that underlie the behaviour of a memory-affected clinical population.

Indexed as

ageingBayesian observer modelcentral tendency effectinterval timingprior distributions

Identifiers

PMID34457319
PMCPMC8371368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.