ArticleClinical case reports2021
Primary cardiac angiosarcoma directly invading the right lung: An autopsy report.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coexisting benign and malignant tumours: a cardiac angiosarcoma case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2026Article
- Multisystemic Tuberculosis Masquerading as Aggressive Cardiac Tumor Causing Budd-Chiari Syndrome Disseminated to the Brain Resulting in Death of a Six-Year-Old Boy.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advancements in Diagnosis and Treatment of Cardiac Sarcomas: A Comprehensive Review.Current treatment options in oncology · 2025Review
- Cardiac angiosarcoma with metastatic to lung, brain, and bone.Radiology case reports · 2024Article
- Primary cardiac angiosarcoma directly invading the right lung: An autopsy report.Clinical case reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We presented a difficult-to-diagnose case of cardiac angiosarcoma. The patient presented pericardial effusion, but cytology of the effusion was negative. Because cytological detection of angiosarcoma cells is difficult, a possibility of malignancy should not be excluded with negative cytological examination. Biopsy of cardiac mass is the best way for diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.