ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2021
A Controlled Study of Continuous Lumbar Drainage of Fluid and Lumbar Puncture Drainage for Aneurysmal SAH after Intracranial Aneurysm Clipping.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and Validation of a Nomogram Model for Assessing the Impact of Continuous Lumbar Drainage Volume on Prognosis in Patients with Acute Hydrocephalus After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Cerebrospinal fluid drainage and chronic hydrocephalus in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients with intraventricular hemorrhage.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Oxidative Stress and Intracranial Hypertension after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Retracted: A Controlled Study of Continuous Lumbar Drainage of Fluid and Lumbar Puncture Drainage for Aneurysmal SAH after Intracranial Aneurysm Clipping.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2022-11-29Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/8FC6ECD9FB96E911E9BDD2C3E525D6
- Retracted
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the different effects of Continuous Lumbar Drainage of fluid and lumbar puncture drainage for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) after intracranial aneurysm clipping. Method: Seventy-five patients with aneurysmal SAH who underwent aneurysm clipping were retrospectively analyzed and were divided into two groups according to the different postoperative drainage methods. The lumbar spine group received lumbar puncture drainage, and the lumbar cistern group received lumbar pool continuous drainage to compare the efficacy. Result: The time to normalize intracranial pressure and headache relief after drainage treatment in the lumbar cistern group was shorter than that in the lumbar spine group. The GOS score was higher than that in the lumbar spine group, and the cerebral artery flow velocity and NIHSS score were significantly lower than those in the lumbar spine group ( Conclusion: Continuous Lumbar Drainage of fluid after intracranial aneurysm clipping for aneurysmal SAH can control symptoms more rapidly, reduce neurological deficits, and improve prognosis than lumbar puncture. Also, the drainage is safer and more widely used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.