Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34457162›Full record

ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science

Assessing the Impact of Imputation on the Interpretations of Prediction Models: A Case Study on Mortality Prediction for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Seyedeh Neelufar Payrovnaziri, Aiwen Xing, Shaeke Salman, Xiuwen Liu, Jiang Bian, Zhe He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Towards Interpretable Multimodal Predictive Models for Early Mortality Prediction of Hemorrhagic Stroke Patients.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Seyedeh Neelufar PayrovnaziriFlorida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
Aiwen XingFlorida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
Shaeke SalmanFlorida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
Xiuwen LiuFlorida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
Jiang BianUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Zhe HeFlorida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
Systematic Analysis of Clinical Study Generalizability Assessment Methods with InformaticsR21AG061431 · NIA · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BIAN, JIANG, HE, ZHE · 2019 to 2020
$793k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NIA NIH HHS R21 AG061431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute myocardial infarction poses significant health risks and financial burden on healthcare and families. Prediction of mortality risk among AM! patients using rich electronic health record (EHR) data can potentially save lives and healthcare costs. Nevertheless, EHR-based prediction models usually use a missing data imputation method without considering its impact on the performance and interpretability of the model, hampering its real-world applicability in the healthcare setting. This study examines the impact of different methods for imputing missing values in EHR data on both the performance and the interpretations of predictive models. Our results showed that a small standard deviation in root mean squared error across different runs of an imputation method does not necessarily imply a small standard deviation in the prediction models' performance and interpretation. We also showed that the level of missingness and the imputation method used can have a significant impact on the interpretation of the models.

Indexed as

Myocardial InfarctionResearch DesignDelivery of Health CareElectronic Health RecordsHumans

Identifiers

PMID34457162
PMCPMC8378616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.